Delhi Court Orders Notice to Assam CM on Miya Muslim Remarks
The Delhi court has issued notice to Assam's Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma over allegations of discriminatory remarks, setting a crucial precedent in safeguarding minority rights. The case underscores the need for accountability and justice amid growing communal tensions.

Highlights
- •Delhi court orders notice to Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma over alleged Miya Muslim remarks
- •Activist Harsh Mander filed a revision petition against an earlier order dismissing his FIR plea
- •Core issue: Allegations of electoral roll purges and discrimination towards 'Miya' Muslims in Assam
- •The court's decision seeks to ensure protection for minority communities by engaging with Zero FIR SOPs
New Delhi: A significant development has emerged in the ongoing legal battle over allegations of discriminatory remarks made by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. In a landmark decision, a Delhi court has issued notice to Sarma after activist Harsh Mander filed a revision petition against an earlier order dismissing his application for the filing of an FIR (First Information Report).
The court's May 26th order, hearing a revision petition in which Mander argued that the initial magistrate's ruling erred through a lack of territorial jurisdiction, now requires Sarma to file a reply. This is set for July 15 and will be pivotal in deciding whether an FIR should indeed be registered.
Background on the Allegations
Mander alleged that during a January 27 event in Digboi, Assam's Tinsukia district, Sarma suggested that 'four to five lakh Miya voters' would face electoral roll purges. Additionally, he made statements suggesting that only through trouble might these communities leave Assam, and that the state is ensuring its citizens cannot vote here.
Drawing attention to Ministry of Home Affairs SOPs for Zero FIR (which allow complaints at any police station), Mander's legal team emphasized the error in dismissing his plea on grounds of territorial jurisdiction. The court appears to recognize these arguments, issuing an order that sets a precedent for future similar cases involving such sensitive issues.
Significance and Impact
In this context, the Delhi court's decision comes at a time when communal tensions remain high in Assam. By acknowledging and engaging with claims of discrimination and electoral manipulation, it signals a commitment to ensuring justice for minorities within the state's governance structure.
The case









